Alcohol: –OH group directly attached to an sp³ hybridised carbon of an aliphatic system. Example: CH3OH (Methanol)
Phenol: –OH group directly attached to an sp² hybridised carbon of an aromatic ring. Example: C6H5OH (Phenol)
Ether: Oxygen atom bonded to two alkyl or aryl groups (R–O–R', Ar–O–R, Ar–O–Ar). Example: CH3OCH3 (Dimethyl ether)
7.1.1 Classification of Alcohols
By number of –OH groups:
Monohydric
C2H5OH
One –OH group
Dihydric
HOCH2CH2OH
Ethylene glycol — Two –OH groups
Trihydric
HOCH2CH(OH)CH2OH
Glycerol — Three –OH groups
Monohydric alcohols further classified by hybridisation of C bearing –OH:
sp³ C–OH Alcohols (Most Important)
Primary (1°)
–OH on a carbon bonded to only one other carbon. Example: CH3CH2OH (Ethanol), CH2=CHCH2OH (Allyl alcohol — also allylic)
Secondary (2°)
–OH on a carbon bonded to two other carbons. Example: CH3CH(OH)CH3 (Propan-2-ol)
Tertiary (3°)
–OH on a carbon bonded to three other carbons. Example: (CH3)3COH (2-Methylpropan-2-ol / tert-Butyl alcohol)
Allylic alcohols: –OH on an sp³ carbon adjacent to C=C. Can be 1°, 2°, or 3°.
Benzylic alcohols: –OH on an sp³ carbon adjacent to an aromatic ring. Example: C6H5CH2OH (Benzyl alcohol — primary benzylic)
Vinylic alcohols (sp² C–OH): –OH directly on a C=C carbon. Example: CH2=CH–OH. These are unstable and tautomerise to carbonyl compounds.
7.1.2 Classification of Phenols
Classified by number of –OH groups on the aromatic ring: monohydric (phenol, cresols), dihydric (catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone), trihydric (pyrogallol).
7.1.3 Classification of Ethers
Simple / Symmetrical
Both groups on oxygen are the same. Example: C2H5–O–C2H5 (Diethyl ether)
Mixed / Unsymmetrical
Two different groups on oxygen. Example: CH3–O–C2H5 (Ethyl methyl ether), C2H5–O–C6H5 (Ethyl phenyl ether)
7.2 Nomenclature
(a) Alcohols
IUPAC Rules for Alcohols
Select the longest carbon chain containing the –OH group as the parent alkane.
Replace the terminal 'e' of alkane with 'ol'. (e.g., ethane → ethanol)
Number the chain from the end nearest to the –OH group to give it the lowest locant.
For polyhydric alcohols: retain the 'e' of alkane and add 'diol', 'triol', etc. (e.g., ethane-1,2-diol)
For cyclic alcohols: use prefix 'cyclo', –OH attached to C-1.
Common and IUPAC Names — Master Table
Structure
Common Name
IUPAC Name
Type
CH3OH
Methyl alcohol / Wood spirit
Methanol
1°
CH3CH2OH
Ethyl alcohol / Grain alcohol
Ethanol
1°
CH3CH2CH2OH
n-Propyl alcohol
Propan-1-ol
1°
CH3CH(OH)CH3
Isopropyl alcohol
Propan-2-ol
2°
CH3CH2CH2CH2OH
n-Butyl alcohol
Butan-1-ol
1°
CH3CH2CH(OH)CH3
sec-Butyl alcohol
Butan-2-ol
2°
(CH3)2CHCH2OH
Isobutyl alcohol
2-Methylpropan-1-ol
1°
(CH3)3COH
tert-Butyl alcohol
2-Methylpropan-2-ol
3°
HOCH2CH2OH
Ethylene glycol
Ethane-1,2-diol
Dihydric
HOCH2CH(OH)CH2OH
Glycerol
Propane-1,2,3-triol
Trihydric
(b) Phenols
The simplest hydroxy derivative of benzene is phenol — both common and accepted IUPAC name. Substituted phenols use ortho/meta/para (common) or numerical locants (IUPAC).
Phenol
C₆H₅OH
o-Cresol
2-Methylphenol
Catechol
Benzene-1,2-diol
Hydroquinone
Benzene-1,4-diol (Quinol)
(c) Ethers
Common names: Name both alkyl/aryl groups alphabetically + "ether". Example: CH3OC2H5 = Ethyl methyl ether.
IUPAC names: Larger group = parent hydrocarbon; smaller group = alkoxy (–OR) or aryloxy (–OAr) substituent. Example: CH3OC2H5 = Methoxyethane.
Structure
Common Name
IUPAC Name
CH3OCH3
Dimethyl ether
Methoxymethane
C2H5OC2H5
Diethyl ether
Ethoxyethane
C6H5OCH3
Methyl phenyl ether (Anisole)
Methoxybenzene
C6H5OC2H5
Ethyl phenyl ether (Phenetole)
Ethoxybenzene
CH3OCH2CH2CH3
Methyl n-propyl ether
1-Methoxypropane
7.3 Structures of Functional Groups
📐
Bond Angles and Lengths — Methanol, Phenol, Methoxymethane
Professional chemistry diagram showing molecular structures of three compounds side by side: (1) Methanol with bond lengths C–O=142pm, O–H=96pm and bond angle 108.9°, (2) Phenol with benzene ring showing C–O=136pm and O–H angle=109°, (3) Methoxymethane with C–O=141pm and C–O–C angle=111.7°. Show lone pairs on oxygen atoms as dots. Fully white background, clean minimalistic style, labeled bond lengths and angles, no background patterns.
Fig. 7.1 — Bond parameters in methanol, phenol and methoxymethane. Note phenol has the shortest C–O bond (136 pm) due to partial double bond character.
Bond Structure Analysis
Alcohols: O is sp³ hybridised. Bond angle slightly less than 109.5° (actual ~108.9°) due to lone pair–lone pair repulsion on oxygen compressing the C–O–H angle.
Phenol: O–H attached to sp² carbon. C–O bond = 136 pm (shorter than in methanol 142 pm). Reason: (i) partial double bond character due to conjugation of O's lone pair with the aromatic ring; (ii) higher electronegativity of sp² carbon holds bonding electrons tighter.
Ethers: O has two bond pairs + two lone pairs, arranged tetrahedrally. Bond angle slightly greater than 109.5° (actual ~111.7° in dimethyl ether) due to repulsion between bulky R groups. C–O bond = 141 pm.
Alkenes react with water in presence of dilute H2SO4 or H3PO4. For unsymmetrical alkenes, follows Markovnikov's rule → OH adds to the more substituted carbon (via more stable carbocation).
>C=C< + H2O ⇌H⁺ >C–C<
| |
H OH
Example (Markovnikov):
CH3CH=CH2 + H2O —H⁺→ CH3CH(OH)CH3 (major: propan-2-ol)
3-step mechanism: (1) Protonation of alkene → carbocation; (2) Nucleophilic attack of H2O on carbocation; (3) Deprotonation to give alcohol. Step 2 is rate-determining.
(ii) Hydroboration–Oxidation (Anti-Markovnikov) — H.C. Brown, Nobel 1979
Diborane (BH3)2 adds to alkene → trialkyl borane → oxidised with H2O2/NaOH → alcohol. Boron attaches to the less substituted sp² carbon (carrying more H atoms) → gives anti-Markovnikov product with excellent yield.
Key Contrast
Acid hydration → Markovnikov → OH on more substituted C → secondary/tertiary alcohol.
Hydroboration–oxidation → Anti-Markovnikov → OH on less substituted C → primary alcohol. No carbocation intermediate → no rearrangement.
2. From Carbonyl Compounds
(i) Reduction of Aldehydes and Ketones
Reagents: H2/Pd or Pt (catalytic hydrogenation), NaBH4, or LiAlH4
Grignard reagent (RMgX) adds nucleophilically to the carbonyl group of an aldehyde or ketone. Hydrolysis of the adduct gives alcohol. This is an excellent method for constructing new C–C bonds.
The –OH group forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds with other –OH groups. Breaking these H-bonds requires significant energy → high boiling points compared to hydrocarbons, ethers, and haloalkanes of comparable molecular mass.
Compound
Molecular Mass
Boiling Point (K)
Reason
Ethanol (C2H5OH)
46
351
Intermolecular H-bonding
Methoxymethane (CH3OCH3)
46
248
No H-bonding (no O–H)
Propane (C3H8)
44
231
Only van der Waals
Trend in alcohols: bp increases with chain length (↑ van der Waals); bp decreases with branching (↓ surface area → weaker van der Waals).
Solubility in Water
Alcohols and phenols are soluble in water because they form hydrogen bonds with water molecules via their –OH groups. Solubility decreases as the size of the hydrophobic alkyl/aryl group increases. Lower molecular mass alcohols (methanol, ethanol, propanol) are miscible with water in all proportions.
For same MW group: n-Butane < Ethoxyethane < Pentanal < Pentan-1-ol (alkane < ether < aldehyde < alcohol)
7.4d Chemical Reactions of Alcohols
Alcohols are versatile — they can act as nucleophiles (O–H bond broken) or as electrophiles (C–O bond broken after protonation). Reaction type depends on conditions.
(a) Reactions Involving Cleavage of O–H Bond
1. Acidity of Alcohols — Reaction with Active Metals
Acid strength of alcohols:Primary > Secondary > Tertiary
Reason: More alkyl groups (electron-donating, +I effect) → increase electron density on O → decrease polarity of O–H → harder to lose H⁺. Tertiary alcohols have three +I groups → most electron-rich O → weakest acid.
Alcohols vs Water: Alcohols are weaker acids than water. R–O⁻ + H–OH → R–OH + ⁻OH. Water is a better proton donor. Alkoxides (RO⁻) are stronger bases than hydroxide (HO⁻).
Methanol → (oxidised in body) → Methanal (HCHO) → Methanoic acid (HCOOH) → blindness and death.
Treatment: Intravenous infusions of diluted ethanol. The enzyme oxidising HCHO to acid becomes saturated with ethanol, allowing kidneys to excrete methanol before it becomes fully toxic.
7.4e Acidity of Phenols & Chemical Reactions
Acidity of Phenols — Why More Acidic than Alcohols?
PHENOL vs ALCOHOL ACIDITY
Phenol is approximately 106 times (1 million times) more acidic than ethanol. (pKa: phenol ≈ 10.0; ethanol ≈ 15.9)
Reason 1 — sp² C of ring: The ring carbon is sp² hybridised (more electronegative than sp³ of alkyl C). This electron withdrawal reduces electron density on O → increases O–H polarity → easier to ionise.
Reason 2 — Resonance stabilisation of phenoxide ion: In alkoxide (RO⁻), negative charge is localised on O. In phenoxide ion (C6H5O⁻), the negative charge is delocalised over the ring (5 resonance structures — charge at O, ortho, and para positions). More stable ion → more favourable ionisation.
🔬
Resonance Structures of Phenoxide Ion (Structures I–V)
NCERT p.207
Shows 5 resonance structures of phenoxide ion: negative charge on O (I), delocalised to ortho positions (II, IV) and para position (III), and fully in ring (V). Demonstrates why phenoxide is more stable than alkoxide.
AI Image Prompt
Professional chemistry diagram showing 5 resonance structures of phenoxide ion (C₆H₅O⁻) connected by double-headed resonance arrows. Fully white background, clean minimalistic. Structure I: O⁻ on oxygen, benzene ring neutral. Structure II: O neutral (double bond to ring), negative charge at ortho carbon. Structure III: charge at para carbon. Structure IV: charge at other ortho carbon. Structure V: delocalized. Show each as a benzene ring with oxygen group. No background patterns, label each structure I through V below.
Resonance structures of phenoxide ion — negative charge delocalised over 5 positions → high stability → favours ionisation of phenol.
Effect of Substituents on Phenol Acidity
Substituent
Position
Effect on Acidity
Reason
–NO2 (electron withdrawing)
ortho/para
Increases acid strength (↓ pKa)
Withdraws electrons → destabilises phenol more than phenoxide → more ionisation. Negative charge in phenoxide delocalised onto N of NO₂
–NO2
meta
Small increase (inductive only)
Resonance stabilisation not possible at meta; only inductive effect
–CH3, alkyl (electron releasing)
any
Decreases acid strength (↑ pKa)
+I effect pushes electrons onto ring → increases electron density on O → harder to release H⁺
–OH group is a strong activating and ortho/para-directing group (via resonance). Phenol reacts with EAS more readily than benzene.
With dilute HNO₃ (298 K):
C6H5OH —dil. HNO₃, 298 K→ o-Nitrophenol (2-nitrophenol) + p-Nitrophenol (4-nitrophenol) Separable by steam distillation: o-isomer is steam volatile (intramolecular H-bonding); p-isomer is not (intermolecular H-bonding, associated molecules).
With concentrated HNO₃:
C6H5OH —conc. HNO₃→ 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (Picric acid) (yield is poor directly)
🧠
o vs p Nitrophenol — H-Bonding Trick
o-Nitrophenol: –NO₂ at ortho position → intramolecular H-bond between –OH and –NO₂ of the same molecule → does NOT associate with other molecules → lower bp → steam volatile.
p-Nitrophenol: –NO₂ at para → cannot form intramolecular H-bond → forms intermolecular H-bonds between molecules → associated → higher bp → not steam volatile.
2. Halogenation of Phenol
(a) In non-polar solvent (CHCl₃ or CS₂), low temperature:
C6H5OH + Br2 —CS₂, 273 K→ o-Bromophenol (minor) + p-Bromophenol (major) No Lewis acid catalyst needed — the activating –OH group polarises Br₂ directly.
(b) With bromine water:
C6H5OH + 3Br2(aq) → 2,4,6-Tribromophenol↓ (white precipitate) + 3HBr This is a qualitative test for phenol — immediate white precipitate confirms presence of phenol.
★ 3. Kolbe's Reaction (Kolbe–Schmitt Reaction)
Phenol treated with NaOH → sodium phenoxide (phenoxide ion is even more reactive than phenol). Sodium phenoxide reacts with CO₂ (weak electrophile) under pressure at 400 K → electrophilic substitution at the ortho position → gives sodium salicylate → acidify → salicylic acid.
Suitable only for primary alkyl groups — must be unhindered and temperature kept low.
Secondary and tertiary alcohols undergo elimination (alkene formation) rather than ether formation at higher temperatures.
Cannot be used to make unsymmetrical ethers like ethyl methyl ether — would give a mixture of three ethers.
★ 2. Williamson Synthesis — Best Laboratory Method
An alkyl halide (preferably primary) reacts with a sodium alkoxide or sodium aryloxide via SN2 mechanism. Works for both symmetrical and unsymmetrical ethers, including aryl ethers.
For aryl ethers (phenol used as phenoxide):
C6H5OH + NaOH → C6H5ONa + R–X → C6H5–O–R (Aryl alkyl ether) + NaX
Critical Limitation of Williamson Synthesis
Alkoxide ions are both nucleophiles AND strong bases. With secondary or tertiary alkyl halides, elimination (E2) competes with substitution (SN2) and usually wins → alkene is the major product, not ether.
Boiling points: Comparable to alkanes of same MW (not to alcohols). Much lower than corresponding alcohols because ethers cannot form intermolecular H-bonds with each other (no O–H bond). Example: Ethoxyethane (MW 74) bp = 307.6 K vs Butan-1-ol (MW 74) bp = 390 K.
Solubility in water: Comparable to alcohols of same MW — oxygen in ether can form H-bonds with water (R–O: ···H–O–H). Ethoxyethane: 7.5 g/100 mL; Butan-1-ol: 9 g/100 mL (similar).
Diethyl ether (common ether) was widely used as anaesthetic but replaced due to slow effect and unpleasant recovery.
C–O bonds are polar → ethers have a net dipole moment.
7.6c Chemical Reactions of Ethers
Ethers are the least reactive of all organic functional groups. Their main chemical reactions:
1. Cleavage of C–O Bond by Hydrogen Halides
C–O bond in ethers is cleaved by concentrated HI or HBr at high temperature. Reactivity order: HI > HBr > HCl
Protonation: Lone pair on O accepts H⁺ from HI → forms oxonium ion (R–O⁺(H)–R')
Nucleophilic attack: I⁻ (good nucleophile) attacks the least substituted carbon of oxonium ion by SN2 → displaces alcohol → gives alkyl iodide + alcohol
If excess HI: The alcohol formed also reacts with another molecule of HI → second alkyl iodide
Special case — tertiary group present: If one alkyl group is tertiary, the tertiary carbocation [(CH3)3C+] forms in step 2 → SN1 mechanism → tertiary halide formed.
(CH3)3C–O–CH3 + HI → CH3OH + (CH3)3C–I (tert-butyl iodide)
Cleavage of Aryl Alkyl Ethers (Anisole type)
In aryl alkyl ethers (Ar–O–R), cleavage always occurs at the alkyl–oxygen bond, NOT the aryl–oxygen bond.
Reason: The Ar–O bond has partial double bond character (sp² carbon + resonance). I⁻ attacks the –CH3 (alkyl side) via SN2 → gives CH3I + phenol. Phenol cannot react further (sp² C cannot undergo nucleophilic substitution).
C6H5–O–CH3 + HI → C6H5OH + CH3I
2. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution of Aryl Ethers (Anisole)
The alkoxy group (–OR) is a strong ortho/para director and activating group — lone pairs on O conjugate with the ring, increasing electron density at ortho and para positions.
Reasons:
(1) Longer chain → greater van der Waals forces → higher bp. That's why methanol < ethanol < propanol < butanol < pentanol.
(2) Within same carbon count, branching decreases bp (reduces surface area → weaker van der Waals). That's why butan-2-ol (branched at C2, more compact shape) has lower bp than butan-1-ol (straight chain, greater contact area).
(3) All have intermolecular H-bonding (–OH present in all), so all are high boiling compared to hydrocarbons of same MW.
Q2
Why is phenol a much stronger acid than ethanol? Explain with reference to the stability of their conjugate bases.
Phenol is ~10⁶ times more acidic than ethanol (pKa: phenol = 10.0; ethanol = 15.9). Two reasons:
1. sp² carbon effect: In phenol, the –OH is attached to an sp² ring carbon (33% s-character, more electronegative). This withdraws electron density from O → increases O–H polarity → easier to release H⁺. In ethanol, the –OH is on an sp³ carbon (less electronegative) → less O–H polarity → harder to ionise.
2. Resonance stabilisation of phenoxide ion: After losing H⁺, the phenoxide ion (C₆H₅O⁻) is stabilised by delocalisation of negative charge over 5 positions (O, two ortho and two para carbons of ring) via 5 resonance structures. This makes phenoxide far more stable. In alkoxide ion (C₂H₅O⁻), the negative charge is localised only on oxygen — no resonance stabilisation. More stable conjugate base → stronger acid.
Q3
What is the Lucas test? How does it distinguish between primary, secondary and tertiary alcohols? Give the mechanism.
Lucas reagent: Concentrated HCl + anhydrous ZnCl₂. Principle: Alcohols are soluble in Lucas reagent; their alkyl halide products are insoluble (immiscible) and produce cloudiness/turbidity.
Results:
• 3° alcohol → turbidity immediately (within seconds) at room temperature
• 2° alcohol → turbidity after ~5 minutes at room temperature
• 1° alcohol → no turbidity at room temperature (requires heating)
Mechanism: ZnCl₂ activates the –OH group by coordinating to oxygen, making it a better leaving group. Protonation by HCl converts –OH to –OH₂⁺. Then carbocation forms (3° most readily because most stable) or SN2 occurs (for 1°). Since 3° carbocations are most stable, they form fastest → fastest reaction → immediate turbidity.
Q4
o-Nitrophenol is more volatile (steam volatile) than p-nitrophenol. Explain.
o-Nitrophenol: The –NO₂ group is at the ortho position, adjacent to the –OH group. An intramolecular hydrogen bond forms between the H of –OH and the O of –NO₂ within the same molecule. This intramolecular H-bond effectively "blocks" the –OH from forming intermolecular hydrogen bonds with other o-nitrophenol molecules. Since there's no significant intermolecular H-bonding, the molecules are not associated → lower boiling point → steam volatile.
p-Nitrophenol: The –NO₂ is at the para position, too far from –OH to form an intramolecular H-bond. Instead, the –OH forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds between different p-nitrophenol molecules → association of molecules → higher boiling point → less volatile → not steam volatile.
Q5
Arrange in order of increasing acid strength and give complete reasoning: Propan-1-ol, 4-methylphenol (p-cresol), phenol, 3-nitrophenol, 3,5-dinitrophenol, 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (picric acid).
Reasoning:
• Propan-1-ol (sp³ C, no resonance of RO⁻) is least acidic.
• Phenols are far more acidic than alcohols due to resonance stabilisation of phenoxide.
• p-Cresol: –CH₃ group (+I effect) increases electron density on ring and O → harder to release H⁺ → less acidic than phenol.
• Nitrophenols: –NO₂ (–I and –M effect) withdraws electrons. More NO₂ groups = stronger acid. At ortho/para positions, the effect is enhanced by resonance stabilisation of the phenoxide ion (negative charge can be delocalised onto N–O of nitro group).
• Meta NO₂ has only inductive effect (weaker than o/p). Hence 3-nitrophenol < 2,4,6-trinitrophenol.
• 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (Picric acid) is the strongest acid — three electron-withdrawing NO₂ groups enormously stabilise phenoxide.
Q6
Write the reactions involved in (i) Kolbe's reaction (ii) Reimer–Tiemann reaction. What products are formed?
(ii) Reimer–Tiemann Reaction:
Phenol + CHCl₃ + NaOH (aq) → Intermediate (CHCl₂ at ortho) → NaOH hydrolysis → sodium salt of salicylaldehyde → H⁺ → 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (Salicylaldehyde)
C₆H₅OH + CHCl₃ →(aq NaOH) [o-ONa-C₆H₄-CHCl₂] →(NaOH) o-OH-C₆H₄-CHO (Salicylaldehyde) Mechanism involves dichlorocarbene (:CCl₂) as the electrophilic intermediate.
Q7
How is 2-methylpropan-2-ol dehydrated differently from propan-1-ol? Give the conditions and explain why.
2-Methylpropan-2-ol (tert-butanol, tertiary):
Dehydrates with only 20% H₃PO₄ at just 358 K (mild conditions).
(CH₃)₃COH → (CH₃)₂C=CH₂ + H₂O (2-methylpropene)
This is easy because the tertiary carbocation (CH₃)₃C⁺ is very stable (stabilised by three +I methyl groups and hyperconjugation).
Propan-1-ol (primary):
Requires concentrated H₂SO₄ at 443 K (harsh conditions).
CH₃CH₂CH₂OH → CH₃CH=CH₂ + H₂O (propene)
The primary carbocation CH₃CH₂CH₂⁺ is very unstable → forms with difficulty → requires high temperature and concentration.
General ease of dehydration: Tertiary > Secondary > Primary — because more stable the intermediate carbocation, lower the activation energy for dehydration.
Q8
Why does the reaction of (CH₃)₃CBr with CH₃ONa give 2-methylpropene (an alkene) rather than (CH₃)₃C–O–CH₃ (the expected ether)?
Sodium methoxide (CH₃ONa) is not only a nucleophile but also a strong base. When a tertiary alkyl halide ((CH₃)₃CBr) is used, elimination (E2) competes with substitution (SN2) and wins because:
1. SN2 requires backside attack on the carbon bearing the halide. In tert-butyl bromide, three bulky methyl groups completely block the back — steric hindrance is maximum → SN2 is essentially impossible (rate ≈ 0).
2. The strong methoxide base instead abstracts a β-hydrogen from one of the methyl groups (E2 elimination) → forms (CH₃)₂C=CH₂ (2-methylpropene) + NaBr + CH₃OH.
Rule: Tertiary alkyl halides never give ethers by Williamson synthesis. To make tert-butyl ether, use tert-butoxide + primary halide instead.
Q9
What product is obtained when anisole (methoxybenzene) is treated with HI? Show the mechanism.
Product: C₆H₅OH (Phenol) + CH₃I (Methyl iodide)
Mechanism:
Step 1: H⁺ from HI protonates the oxygen of anisole → methylphenyl oxonium ion (C₆H₅–O⁺(H)–CH₃) forms.
Step 2: I⁻ attacks the CH₃ group (alkyl–oxygen bond is weaker than aryl–oxygen bond because aryl C is sp²-hybridised with partial double bond character to O). SN2 attack by I⁻ on the –CH₃ → CH₃I formed + phenol released.
Phenol does NOT react further with HI because the sp²-hybridised carbon of phenol's ring cannot undergo nucleophilic substitution needed to convert OH to halide.
Q10
Predict the major product of hydroboration–oxidation of (i) 1-methylcyclohexene (ii) propene, and explain how this differs from acid hydration.
(i) 1-Methylcyclohexene + (BH₃)₂ then H₂O₂/NaOH:
Boron adds to the less substituted carbon (=CH– side, away from methyl). OH appears on less substituted carbon.
Product: 1-methylcyclohexan-2-ol (trans addition, OH at C2, not C1 where methyl is).
Acid hydration of 1-methylcyclohexene → Markovnikov → OH at C1 (tertiary carbon) → 1-methylcyclohexanol.
(ii) Propene:
Hydroboration: CH₃CH=CH₂ → Propan-1-ol (OH at terminal/less substituted C1) — Anti-Markovnikov
Acid hydration: CH₃CH=CH₂ → Propan-2-ol (OH at C2, more substituted) — Markovnikov
Key difference summary: Hydroboration–oxidation = anti-Markovnikov (OH on less substituted C, syn addition, no carbocation intermediate, no rearrangement). Acid hydration = Markovnikov (OH on more substituted C, via carbocation).
Q11
Starting from suitable Grignard reagent(s) and carbonyl compounds, show how you would synthesise: (a) 1-phenylethanol (b) 2-methylpropan-2-ol
CONCEPTAlcohol vs Phenol: Alcohol has –OH on sp³ C (aliphatic); Phenol has –OH on sp² C of aromatic ring. C–O bond in phenol (136 pm) shorter than in methanol (142 pm) due to resonance.
CONCEPTAcidity order: Picric acid >> p-Nitrophenol >> Phenol >> p-Cresol >> Cyclohexanol >> Ethanol. Phenol is ~10⁶ more acidic than ethanol due to resonance stabilisation of phenoxide ion.
CONCEPTAcid strength of alcohols: Primary > Secondary > Tertiary (fewer alkyl groups → less electron donation → more O–H polarity). Alcohols are weaker acids than water.
CONCEPTEase of dehydration: Tertiary > Secondary > Primary (stability of carbocation intermediate). Ease of esterification (with HX): Tertiary > Secondary > Primary (Lucas test principle).
CONCEPTHydroboration–oxidation: Anti-Markovnikov, syn addition, no carbocation, no rearrangement, gives primary alcohol from terminal alkene. (H.C. Brown, Nobel 1979 with Wittig)
CONCEPTWilliamson synthesis limitation: Use primary alkyl halide only. Secondary/tertiary → elimination product (alkene), not ether. Alkoxide is a strong base + nucleophile.
CONCEPTEther cleavage by HI: Dialkyl ether → 2 alkyl halides. Aryl alkyl ether → always cleaves at alkyl–O bond (Ar–O stronger due to sp² C resonance) → ArOH + RX.
REACTIONPhenol + Br₂(aq) → 2,4,6-Tribromophenol↓ (white ppt) + 3HBr. Qualitative test for phenol — no Lewis acid needed because –OH highly activates ring.
MCQPCC (Pyridinium chlorochromate) oxidises 1° alcohol → aldehyde only (no over-oxidation to acid). KMnO₄/H⁺ gives carboxylic acid from primary alcohol.
MCQMethanol → blindness/death (oxidised to HCHO then HCOOH). Treatment: dilute ethanol IV (competes with methanol for oxidising enzyme). Methanol = wood spirit; Ethanol = grain spirit.